download pdf c#

using pdfdocument c#

c# save as pdf

pdf compressor download free windows 8, pdf download load online software, pdf application file using windows, pdf document read vb.net word, pdf best free open source software,

pdf annotation in c#, itextsharp add annotation to existing pdf c#, open pdf and draw c#, open pdf and draw c#, open pdf and draw c#, itextsharp add annotation to existing pdf c#, open pdf and draw c#, open pdf and draw c#, pdf annotation in c#, pdf annotation in c#, pdf annotation in c#, itextsharp add annotation to existing pdf c#, open pdf and draw c#, open pdf and draw c#, pdf annotation in c#

display pdf in mvc, asp.net core pdf library, asp.net mvc 4 generate pdf, how to read pdf file in asp.net using c#, how to write pdf file in asp.net c#, pdf viewer in asp.net web application, asp.net pdf viewer annotation, print pdf file using asp.net c#, azure ocr pdf, mvc open pdf file in new window

c# pdfsharp example,
windows form application in c# examples pdf,
windows form application in c# examples pdf,
save memorystream to pdf file c#,
windows form application in c# with database pdf,
how to add header and footer in pdf using c#,
adobe pdf api c#,
how to make pdf report in asp.net c#,
how to download pdf file from gridview in asp.net using c#,

While all scenarios are stories about people and their activities, context scenarios are the most storylike of the three types we employ. The focus is on the persona s activities, as well as her motivations and mental model. Context scenarios describe the broad context in which usage patterns are exhibited and include environmental and organizational (in the case of enterprise systems) considerations. 10 As we discussed above, this is where design begins. As you develop context scenarios, you should be focusing on how the product you are designing can best help your personas achieve their goals. Context scenarios establish the primary touch points that each primary and secondary persona has with the system (and possibly with other personas) over the course of a day or some other meaningful length of time. Context scenarios should be broad and relatively shallow in scope. They should not describe product or interaction detail but rather should focus on high-level actions from the user s perspective. It is important to map out the big picture first so that we can systematically identify user requirements. Only then will we be able to design appropriate interactions and interfaces. Context scenarios address questions such as the following:

Subnet 3f 172.16.95.0/24

In what setting(s) will the product be used Will it be used for extended amounts of time Is the persona frequently interrupted Are there multiple users on a single workstation or device With what other products will it be used What primary activities does the persona need to perform to meet her goals What is the expected end result of using the product How much complexity is permissible, based on persona skill and frequency of use

2 3 4 5

Subnet 3b 172.16.80.0/21

Figure 11-11 A stovetop with poor physical mapping of controls. Does the knob on the far-left control the left-front or left-rear burner Users must figure out the mapping anew each time they use the stovetop.

Subnet 3e 172.16.94.0/24

upc internet vzduchem, java gs1 128, generate pdf417 c#, barcode scanner c# code project, adobe pdf library sdk c#, vb.net code 128 reader

In this case, we have a physical mapping problem. The result of using the control is reasonably clear: A burner will heat up when you turn a knob. However, the target of the control which burner will get warm is unclear. Does twisting the leftmost knob turn on the left-front burner, or does it turn on the left-rear burner Users must find out by trial and error or by referring to the tiny icons next to the knobs. The unnaturalness of the mapping compels users to figure this relationship out anew every time they use the stove. This cognitive work may become semiconscious over time, but it still exists, making users prone to error if they are rushed or distracted (as people often are while preparing meals). In the best-case scenario, users feel stupid because they ve twisted the wrong knob, and their food doesn t get hot until they notice the error. In the worst-case scenario, they might accidentally burn themselves or set fire to the kitchen. The solution requires moving the physical locations of the stovetop knobs so that they better suggest which burners they control. The knobs don t have to be laid out in exactly the same pattern as the burners, but they should be positioned so that the target of each knob is clear. The stovetop in Figure 11-12 is a good example of an effective mapping of controls. In this layout, it s clear that the upper-left knob controls the upper-left burner. The placement of each knob visually suggests which burner it will turn on. Donald Norman (1989) calls this more intuitive layout natural mapping. Another example of poor mapping of a different type is pictured in Figure 11-13. In this case, it is the logical mapping of concepts to actions that is unclear.

Subnet 3c 172.16.88.0/22

Figure 11-12 Clear spatial mapping. On this stovetop, it is clear which knob maps to which burner because the spatial arrangement of knobs clearly associates each knob with a burner.

public Monitor (Datapool dp, Config myconf ig , NetworkArchitecture t-netvorkArchitecture, mGUI t-GUI) C m-datapool = dp; m-mystate = myconfig; m-GUI = t-GUI; m-netvorkArchitecture = t-netvorkArchitecture; neighborIDs = m-netvorkArchitecture.kHopNeighborIDs(1); neighborcoords = m-networkArchitecture.kHopNeighborCoords(1); targethadings = new intCneighborIDs.length1;

Subnet 3d 172.16.92.0/23

Figure 11-13 An example of a logical mapping problem. If a user wants to see the most recent items first, does he choose Ascending or Descending These terms don t map well to how users conceive of time.

.net core qr code generator, dotnet core barcode generator, uwp barcode generator, barcode in asp net core